Siux Trilogy Elite 2026
2026

Siux Trilogy Elite 2026

Shape
Round
Weight
360 to 375 g
Balance
Not published
Core
EVA
Does it suit your game?Seven quick questions, with this racket as the starting point.
Question 1 of 7

What is your level?

The short answer

The Siux Trilogy Elite 2026 is a round control racket for advanced players. It is listed at 360 to 375 g with a 3K carbon face and EVA core. On paper it gives high control and low power, and it is slow to swing. No reviews exist yet, so this rests on the specs alone.

RBy · facts checked 18 October 2026

Choose it if

  • you are an advanced player who wins points with placement and patience rather than smashes
  • you want a round head and an EVA core that shops list as soft to medium density
  • you can handle 360 to 375 g comfortably through a long match

Skip it if

  • you want quick hands at the net, in which case the Dunlop Galactica OS reads High on maneuverability
  • you rely on the racket to add power to your smash, since this one reads Low on power
  • you want a more maneuverable round racket, such as the Siux Gea 2, which reads Medium on maneuverability

How it plays

Not enough specs yet for a play profile.

  • Control The round shape and EVA core push control to High, so placement should come easily.
  • Power Power reads Low because the round shape lowers it; the heavy weight raises it, but not enough.
  • Comfort Comfort sits at Medium, with the EVA core and soft-leaning 3K face working against the heavy weight.
  • Handling Maneuverability reads Low, since the heavy weight makes quick swings at the net harder.
  • Forgiveness The sweet spot reads Medium, helped by the round shape but not generous.

Specifications

Launched2026The newest version of this racket
Weight360 to 375 gAverage: not tiring, stable enough
Face3K carbonSoft carbon: more feel and easier ball exit
CoreEVAMedium hard: the middle ground
Thickness38 mmThe maximum the rules allow
SurfaceLija
FrameCarbon

Not published by the brand: balance, head size, handle

Specs from zonadepadel.es · checked 26 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Report it →

Two numbered siblings sit around this listing. The Elite 5 (2025) has a soft EVA core, 12K carbon and 355 to 375 g. The Elite 6 (2026) changed to EVA, 3K carbon, a carbon frame and a sandy surface label, with the same weight range. Shape, level and balance label stayed the same between the Elite 5 and 6. This 2026 listing matches the Elite 6 on core, face and thickness, but states 360 g as the lower weight limit. Whether that is a real change or just a different listing is not clear. Look at the Elite 6 first, and check the weight on the listing you buy from.

Price history

Today€ 134.95Lowest in 30 days€ 134.95vs 30-day average-5%
5 Oct€ 134.95 · € 149.9014 Nov

Lowest price per day across the shops in your market. Checked every night.

Three Trilogy Elite listings sit side by side: the 5, the 6 and this one, called 2026. On paper only the weight floor separates this one from the Elite 6: 360 g against 355 g. No reviews exist for it yet, so this page works from the specs.

Elite 5, Elite 6 or Elite 2026: sorting three names

The Elite 5 is the 2025 model. It lists a soft EVA core, a 12K carbon face and 355 to 375 g. The Elite 6 is a 2026 model with EVA, 3K carbon, 38 mm thickness and the same 355 to 375 g.

This listing sits next to both. It shows EVA, 3K carbon, a carbon frame, 38 mm and 360 to 375 g. That matches the Elite 6 on almost everything. The only gap is the lower weight limit.

Is it the same racket under a different label? The specs cannot say. A different label is not proof of a different racket. If the weight range matters to you, check the figure on the exact listing you buy from.

The Trilogy familySame year, from most power (left) to most control (right)

Round head, 360 to 375 g: why control is High and handling is Low

A round head keeps the balance lower, which tends to help control. Here the round shape and EVA core both raise control, and the meter reads High.

The same shape lowers power. A round racket rarely gives free pace, so you generate it with your swing. The heavy weight raises power a little, but not enough to lift the meter off Low.

Then there is handling. 360 to 375 g is heavy for a racket that is meant to be precise. The weight lowers maneuverability, even though the round shape raises it. The meter lands on Low. At the net, in fast exchanges, you need to prepare early.

The balance of this exact listing is not published. The Elite 5 and Elite 6 listings both carry a low balance label, so a similar character is possible, but that is an inference.

3K carbon over EVA: what changed from the Elite 5 recipe

The jump from the Elite 5 to the Elite 6 is clearest in the face. The 12K carbon became 3K carbon. The core went from soft EVA to plain EVA. The frame label changed from 3K carbon and aramid to carbon, and the surface label from rough to sandy.

This listing follows the newer recipe. Its 3K face counts as carbon-soft in the comfort calculation, which helps comfort. The heavy weight pulls it back down, which is why comfort stays at Medium.

Shops list the core density as soft to medium and name a Switch Strap as the anti-vibration feature. The product page claims a wide sweet spot and a comfortable touch. Treat that as marketing. The spec-based meter reads Medium for the sweet spot.

Gea 2 and Galactica OS: the two rackets that handle faster

If maneuverability matters most, two rackets are close on paper. The Siux Gea 2 is also round, 38 mm and High on control. It lists 355 to 375 g and reads Medium on maneuverability against Low here. For the Gea 2, everything else in the meters matches.

The Dunlop Galactica OS goes further. It is round, 3K carbon, 38 mm and fixed at 360 g. Its maneuverability reads High. Control stays High and power stays Low, so on paper you give up little in the other meters.

Not a bigger change, but a handier one. If maneuverability matters most, these two are worth comparing.

Trilogy Pro 2026 above it: where comfort drops to Low

The Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 is rated Professional. It lists a 24K carbon face with an EVA rubber core. Its comfort reads Low, against Medium here, while control stays High.

That contrast is useful. The Elite reads higher on comfort on paper, but neither is light. Both list a top weight of 375 g, so check the weight before you choose.

What no one has tested yet

No tested review or player report for this racket is available. That means no verdict on real-court feel, durability or how the heavy weight plays after an hour. The meters come from specs, not from play.

The product page calls it a control racket for advanced players. The listed level and the Control profile from shops agree. Only a court test can show whether the weight suits you, so try one if you can.

Written byPadel player and founder of padell.io

Bought, played and sold more rackets than was good for him, and built padell.io to bring it all together.

About padell.io →

Was this page useful?

Similar rackets

All rackets that play like the Siux Trilogy Elite 2026 →

Questions before you buy

Is the Trilogy Elite 2026 the same as the Elite 6?

Very close on paper. Both list EVA, 3K carbon, 38 mm and a round shape. Only the lower weight limit differs, 360 g against 355 g. Whether that is a real difference is not confirmed.

How does it differ from the Elite 5?

The Elite 5 lists a soft EVA core and a 12K carbon face. This one lists EVA and 3K carbon. The frame and surface labels also changed in the step to the Elite 6.

Is it a good fit for beginners?

Not on paper. It is listed for advanced players, reads Low on maneuverability and Low on power, and weighs 360 to 375 g. A more maneuverable round racket such as the Siux Gea 2 is a gentler start.

Is it kind to the arm?

Comfort reads Medium. The EVA core and 3K face help, and a Switch Strap anti-vibration feature is listed. The heavy weight lowers comfort in the meter.

Is the Trilogy Elite 2026 worth the money right now?

Which shops deliver, and what shipping costs, depends on your country. The price comparison shows it for yours.

See all prices
How heavy is it really?

The brand gives 360 to 375 g. That counts as medium. Each racket can differ within that range.

Why a range? →