adidas Adipower Light 3.2 vs adidas Metalbone Ctrl 3.2

The verdict

Choose the Adipower Light 3.2 if you want more comfort. The Metalbone Ctrl 3.2 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Adipower Light 3.2
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5
Metalbone Ctrl 3.2
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Better buy now: the Adipower Light 3.2. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 40.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Adipower Light 3.2 to the Metalbone Ctrl 3.2: less comfort.

Controlabout the same9.09.0
Powera bit more power4.04.5
Comfortless comfort7.05.5
Handlingabout the same6.06.0
Forgivenessabout the same8.08.0

Adipower Light 3.2Metalbone Ctrl 3.2Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Face
Carbon Aluminized 24K
2-to-1 Aluminized Carbon
Core
EVA Soft Energy
EVA Soft Performance
Head size
460 cm²
485 cm²
Surface
Spin Blade Mold
Spin Blade Decal, Spin Blade Mold
Frame
Dual Exoskeleton
Carbon
Show all specs (5 the same)
Launched
2023
2023
Shape
Round
Round
Weight
345 to 360 g
345 to 360 g
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm

Reviews and videos

padel.fyi

Rates both about the same: 7.9 and 8.0.

Adipower Light 3.27.9Best for: Conservative players seeking balanced, maneuverable lightweight performanceRead the review
Metalbone Ctrl 3.28.0Best for: Right-side intermediate players seeking balanced control and comfortRead the review

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: easy to handle.

Adipower Light 3.23 videos
  • Easy to handle 3×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Lacks power 3×
Metalbone Ctrl 3.23 videos
  • Easy to handle 3×
  • Good control 2×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×

Or a third racket in between

StarVieKenta + 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the Metalbone Ctrl 3.2.

Was this page useful?