Rackets › Compare

adidas Adipower Multiweight 3.2 vs adidas Metalbone HRD 3.2

Add a racket

The verdict

On paper they play much the same, so price and feel decide.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Adipower Multiweight 3.2 to the Metalbone HRD 3.2 you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.

Controla bit more control4.04.5
Powera bit more power9.510.0
Comforta bit less comfort4.03.5
Handlingabout the same3.03.0
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness3.53.0

Adipower Multiweight 3.2Metalbone HRD 3.2Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Face
Carbon Aluminized 18K
2-1 Aluminized Carbon
Head size
460 cm²
485 cm²
Surface
Power Embossed Ridge
Not published
Frame
Not published
Carbon
Show all specs (6 the same)
Launched
2023
2023
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Weight
345 to 360 g
345 to 360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Core
EVA High Memory
EVA High Memory
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Adipower Multiweight 3.2: 0. Of the Metalbone HRD 3.2: 1.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Adipower Multiweight 3.2

No summarised videos yet.

Metalbone HRD 3.24 videos
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Harder in defence 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 2×
Adipower Multiweight 3.2: reviews and videos →Metalbone HRD 3.2: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

JomaHyper Pro SFT

Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Adipower Multiweight 3.2.

€ 161.00Compare all three →

Was this page useful?