adidas Metalbone 3.3 vs adidas Metalbone 3.2
The verdict
Choose the Metalbone 3.3 if you want more power. The Metalbone 3.2 does nothing clearly better on paper.
From the Metalbone 3.2 to the Metalbone 3.3 2 specs changed: face Aluminized Carbon became Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1 fiber; surface Spin Blade Mold became Spin Blade Decal.
- Power+1.0
On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.
Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.
Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →
How they play
From the Metalbone 3.3 to the Metalbone 3.2: less power.
From the Metalbone 3.2 to the Metalbone 3.3: more power.
Metalbone 3.3Metalbone 3.2Line = the average of all rackets
Where the specs differ
Show all specs (7 the same)
Not published for one of the two, so not compared: pro player.
Reviews and videos
No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone 3.3: 1. Of the Metalbone 3.2: 0.
Often mentioned in video reviews
- Adjustable weight system 5×
- Good spin 3×
- Good in defence 2×
- Large sweet spot 2×
- Little feel 3×
- Demanding, needs good technique 2×
- Lacks power 2×
- Expensive 2×
No summarised videos yet.
Or a third racket in between
Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Metalbone 3.2.
Was this page useful?










