Stiga Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition vs Dunlop Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026

The verdict

Choose the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition if you want more handling, the Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026 if you want more comfort.

Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson EditionHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0
Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition to the Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026: more comfort, less handling.

Controla bit more control5.05.5
Powera bit less power9.08.5
Comfortmore comfort2.03.5
Handlingless handling3.52.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness4.55.0

Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson EditionGalactica Pro By Nisse 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
Not published
2026
Shape
Cybershape
Hybrid
Weight
360 g
360 to 375 g
Face
18K Carbon Duplex
Carbon 16k
Core
Performance Foam
Pro EVA
Surface
Sandy
3D Rough
Handle
Longer handle for more flexible play
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame in 100 % carbon fibre
Not published
Show all specs (1 the same)
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition: 0. Of the Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026: 0.

Or a third racket in between

BabolatAir Viper 2.6

Better where both are weak: handling 5.5 against 3.5 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.