adidas Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3
2024

adidas Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3

8.5padell.io scoreSpecs only
Shape
Round
Weight
360 to 375 g
Balance
Even
Core
EVA Soft Performance
Does it suit your game?Seven quick questions, with this racket as the starting point.
Question 1 of 7

What is your level?

The short answer

The Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3 is a round, even-balance control racket with a 6K carbon face and a soft EVA core. It weighs 360 to 375 g, which is heavy. On paper it suits steady, patient play. The catch: handling is slow and power is modest, though one video reviewer found real power from the sweet spot.

RBy · facts checked 5 November 2026

Choose it if

  • you build points with patience and want a round head that forgives off-centre hits
  • you want a soft carbon face and a soft core to keep your arm calm over long matches
  • you value placement and control over raw pace, as Dani 13 and Virgin Active Padel Club ZA did in their video reviews

Skip it if

  • you want a lighter racket for quick hands at the net, such as the adidas Metalbone Ctrl 3.3 at 345 to 360 g
  • you rely on the racket to add pace to your smashes, where the adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.3 is a diamond, head-heavy racket with a High power profile
  • you are new to padel, since this racket is heavy at 360 to 375 g and listed by the brand as Professional

How it plays

8.5
padell.io score 8.5Play 8.6 (60%) and reviews 8.4 (40%). No independent reviews found yet, so that part starts low. How the score works
Control8.0above average▲
Power4.0below average▼
Comfort7.5above average▲
Handling5.0around average●
Forgiveness7.5above average▲

Line = the average of all rackets ▲ above ▼ below

On paper this is a calm, controlling racket that asks you to supply the pace.

  • Control The round shape, even balance and soft core all point towards accurate, predictable placement.
  • Power A round head and a soft core hold back free pace, so you generate most of it yourself.
  • Comfort The soft core and the 6K carbon face should keep vibration low, although the heavy weight works against that a little.
  • Handling The racket is heavy, so it is slow to swing around, even with a round head.
  • Forgiveness The round shape and soft core suggest a large, forgiving hitting zone.

Specifications

Launched2024Newer version from 2025
Weight360 to 375 gAverage: not tiring, stable enough
BalanceEven according to the brandEven: quick at the net, enough in the smash
Face6K carbonSoft carbon: more feel and easier ball exit
CoreEVA Soft PerformanceSoft: comfort and ball exit, less control at high speed
Thickness38 mmThe maximum the rules allow
Head size485 cm²
SurfaceSpin Blade DecalRough: helps with spin
FrameOctagonal Structure

Not published by the brand: handle

Specs from the brand's own site · checked 23 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Report it →

Video reviews

10 videos from independent channels and shops

What 9 video reviewers say

7 played it on court, 2 discuss the specs

Often mentioned
Plus points
  • Good control7 of 9
  • Easy to handle6 of 9
  • Lots of power4 of 9
  • Comfortable, little vibration2 of 9
  • Good in defence2 of 9
  • Good spin2 of 9
  • Large sweet spot2 of 9
  • Good at the net2 of 9
Minus points
  • Lacks power5 of 9
  • Harder to handle2 of 9
Summaries by padell.io, based on what each reviewer says in the video. Tap a time to watch that moment.
Tested on court

The reviewer finds this racket offers a unique combination of power and control. It provides a soft feel and allows for precise ball placement while maintaining high performance.

Discusses the specs

The reviewer describes the racket as a high performance tool designed for precision and control. It is well suited for intermediate players who prefer a defensive game and longer rallies over raw power.

Tested on court

The reviewer finds the racket offers excellent agility and maneuverability from the back of the court. It provides a comfortable feel that allows for extended play without causing arm fatigue.

Tested on court

The reviewer finds this racket to be a technical and demanding option that offers excellent control. It performs well in fast-paced play and provides good power for its category, making it suitable for intermediate to advanced players.

Tested on court

The reviewer finds this racket offers good control and handling, especially in defensive situations and at the net. It requires a more precise strike to get the best performance, as the sweet spot is quite centered and small. It is a suitable choice for intermediate to advanced players who prefer a more direct feel.

Tested on court

The reviewer finds this racket to be a well-balanced and agile option that does not vibrate. It offers good control and is suitable for players who prioritize precision and maneuverability over raw power.

The 3.3 (2024), the 3.4 (2025) and the 2026 list identical published specs, apart from one figure. That means a 6K carbon face, EVA Soft Performance core, round shape, even balance, 38 mm thickness and 360 to 375 g. The only addition is a 260 mm balance figure on the 2026 page, which the others leave blank. A changed label is not a changed racket. The specs do not tell the 3.3 and 3.4 apart. Look at the 3.4 or the 2026 if they are easier to get.

Price history

Today€ 126.95Lowest in 30 days€ 126.95vs 30-day average-6%
23 Sept€ 126.95 · € 169.9514 Nov

Lowest price per day across the shops in your market. Checked every night.

What reviewers say

There are no written test reviews for this racket, only three video reviews. Dani 13, who played it, praised control in slow and fast play, but called it demanding, felt vibration off-centre and needed effort for depth. Virgin Active Padel Club ZA, who also played it, praised the soft sweet spot and precise placement, and found real power from it. Padel Profi Deutschland did not test it on court. It speaks of maximum power and balanced control, and mentions a diamond shape, which does not match this round racket. The split is mostly about power: one reviewer needed effort for depth, another found significant power. Both views sit awkwardly with the Low power profile on paper.

Three names, nearly one spec sheet. The Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3, the 3.4 and the 2026 all list a 6K carbon face, a round head, an even balance and 360 to 375 g. Only the 2026 adds a balance figure. So what do the names actually sort?

3.3, 3.4 or 2026: three names, one published recipe

Not three rackets, but three labels on the same published recipe. Compared with the 3.4, nothing differs: the same core, face, shape, 38 mm thickness, 485 cm2 head and weight range. The 2026 also matches, and only adds a balance figure of 260 mm that the other two do not publish. That is a gap in the listing, not a measured change.

The Metalbone familySame year, from most power (left) to most control (right)

Three video reviews, three readings of the power

The video reviewers describe different things. Dani 13 played it and called it technical and demanding, with strong control but vibration on off-centre hits and effort needed to get depth. Virgin Active Padel Club ZA also played it and found a soft, responsive sweet spot with real power from it. Padel Profi Deutschland did not test it on court. Its review talks about a diamond shape and maximum power, which does not match this round racket, so treat it with caution.

Round head, even balance, 360 to 375 g: why handling reads Low

A round head and an even balance normally make a racket easy to move. Weight cancels that out. At 360 to 375 g this racket is at the heavy end, so it is slower to swing. What can you do? Keep your swings compact and your preparation early. The profile drivers show that the heavy weight raises the power rating slightly, which is why the power meter does not fall even lower.

6K carbon on the Metalbone, 3K on the Adipower: the twin that differs by one face

The closest relative is the adidas Adipower Ctrl 3.3. It lists the same round shape, even balance, soft core, 38 mm thickness and weight range. The one published difference is the face: 3K carbon there, 6K carbon here. Its meters read the same as this racket. The two share the same meters and differ only in face.

Octagonal Structure and Spin Blade, says adidas: what the page claims

The brand lists an Octagonal Structure frame and a Spin Blade Decal surface. The product page text claims the tubular octagonal core gives great consistency and very high resistance to torsion. It also claims the hole pattern creates more friction for spin. Those are marketing claims, not measurements. Part of that text appears to describe other adidas rackets, so read it with care. The Padel Profi Deutschland video, which did not test it on court, also mentions extra spin from the rough surface, but it describes a diamond shape too, which does not match this racket.

Not published: balance in mm, handle, weight system

Adidas gives the balance only as a label, Even, with no millimetre figure for the 3.3. The handle details and any weight system are not published either. So you cannot judge exactly how even the balance is, or how the grip is built. The brand lists Pol Hernandez as the pro player and gives the level as Professional. Dani 13 put it at intermediate to advanced. If you are between levels, the weight is the first thing to check against your own arm.

Written byPadel player and founder of padell.io

Bought, played and sold more rackets than was good for him, and built padell.io to bring it all together.

About padell.io →

Was this page useful?

Similar rackets

All rackets that play like the adidas Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3 →

Questions before you buy

Is the Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3 different from the 3.4?

Not on the published specs. Face, core, shape, balance label, thickness, head size and weight range are all the same. The 3.4 simply lists a later year.

Is it a racket for beginners?

The brand lists it as Professional, and Dani 13 called it demanding for some players. At 360 to 375 g it is also heavy. Beginners may find a lighter racket easier.

How does it differ from the Adipower Ctrl 3.3?

The one published difference is the face: 6K carbon here, 3K carbon on the Adipower. Shape, balance label, core, thickness and weight range match.

Is it kind to the arm?

On paper, yes: the soft core and carbon face point to good comfort. The weight works the other way, and Dani 13 felt vibration on off-centre hits.

Is the Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 3.3 worth the money right now?

Today's price is labelled "Fair price" compared with the rackets that play most alike. Which shops deliver, and what shipping costs, depends on your country. The price comparison shows it for yours.

See all prices
What is the closest alternative?

The adidas Adipower Ctrl 3.3 plays most alike. Differences: power +1.0. Today: € 154.00.

Compare side by side →
Who should not buy it?

Skip it if you want easy power for smashes (power 4.0/10).

How heavy is it really?

The brand gives 360 to 375 g. That counts as medium. Each racket can differ within that range.

Why a range? →