Rackets · Babolat · Air Vertuo
Babolat Air Vertuo 2.6
Babolat · 2026

Air Vertuo 2.6

7.9padell.io scoreSpecs + 4 review sources
Shape
Teardrop
Weight
335 to 355 g
Balance
Even
Core
Black EVA
Does it suit your game?Seven quick questions, with this racket as the starting point.
Question 1 of 7

What is your level?

The short answer

A all-round racket: quick at the net.

Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.

Strong at

  • Quick at the net
  • Light, responsive, effortless acceleration
  • Excellent comfort and forgiveness for beginners

Less strong at

  • Limited raw power for aggressive finishes
  • Lacks sufficient power for advanced players
  • Limited control and precision against fast balls

How it plays

7.9
padell.io score 7.9Play 7.7 (75%) and reviews 8.5 (25%). Based on 4 review sources. How we score
Control6.0Medium
Power6.0Medium
Comfort5.5Medium
Handling7.0Medium
Forgiveness5.0Low

Specifications

ShapeTeardrop
Weight335 to 355 g
BalanceEven
Facefiberglass
CoreBlack EVA
Thickness38 mm
Head sizeNot published
Surface3D SPIN
HandleSyntec Team
FrameCarbon

Specs from the brand's own site · checked 23 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Tell us →

We started tracking this racket on 23 Sept. The chart appears after a week of prices.

What reviewers say

Similar rackets

Questions before you buy

Is the Air Vertuo 2.6 worth the money right now?

Today's price is labelled "Good value" compared with the rackets that play most alike. Which shops deliver, and what shipping costs, depends on your country. The price comparison shows it for yours.

See all prices
What is the closest alternative?

The Babolat Air Veron 2.6 plays most alike. Differences: handling -1.5, power +1.0. Today: € 164.95.

Compare side by side →
Who should not buy it?

Skip it if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 5.5/10), or if you are still learning: it is not very forgiving (5.0/10).

How heavy is it really?

The brand gives 335 to 355 g. That counts as light on our scale. Each racket can differ within that range.

Why a range? →