
Counter Viper 2.6
8.5padell.io scoreSpecs + 2 review sources- Shape
- Round
- Weight
- 365 g
- Balance
- Head-heavy
- Core
- X-EVA
A control racket: easy to place the ball, forgiving when you hit off-centre. Made for advanced players.
Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.Strong at
- Easy to place the ball
- Forgiving on off-centre hits
- Exceptional control and defensive play with secure feeling
Less strong at
- Demands proper technique and timing, not beginner-friendly
- Firm impact and head-heavy balance cause fatigue
How it plays
Specifications
| Shape | Round |
|---|---|
| Weight | 365 g |
| Balance | Head-heavy, 270 mm |
| Face | 3K Carbon |
| Core | X-EVA |
| Thickness | 38 mm |
| Head size | Not published |
| Surface | 3D Spin+ |
| Handle | Not published |
| Frame | Carbon |
Specs from the brand's own site · checked 23 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Tell us →
We started tracking this racket on 23 Sept. The chart appears after a week of prices.
What reviewers say
Best forAdvanced right-handed players seeking control-based counter-attacking play
Review in FrenchRead the full review →“It suits an upper-intermediate or advanced player who brings compact preparation and wants the racket to reward technique rather than replace it.”
Read the full review →Similar rackets
Questions before you buy
Is the Counter Viper 2.6 worth the money right now?
Today's price is labelled "Fair price" compared with the rackets that play most alike. Which shops deliver, and what shipping costs, depends on your country. The price comparison shows it for yours.
See all pricesWhat is the closest alternative?
The Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 plays most alike. Differences: control -2.0, handling -2.0. Today: € 164.91.
Compare side by side →Who should not buy it?
Skip it if you want easy power for smashes (power 5.5/10), or if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 5.5/10).
How heavy is it really?
The brand gives 365 g. That counts as medium on our scale. Each racket can differ within that range.
Why a range? →

