Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 vs LOK Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera
The verdict
Choose the Counter Viper 2.6 if you want more handling and control, the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera if you want more power.
- Handling+2.0
- Control+1.5
- Power+1.5
The Counter Viper 2.6 plays better on paper (8.5 against 7.7), the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera costs € 45.00 less in Netherlands. Pick the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera if the price matters more than that difference.
Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →
How they play
From the Counter Viper 2.6 to the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera: less handling, less control, more power.
From the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera to the Counter Viper 2.6: more handling, more control, less power.
Counter Viper 2.6Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea CalderaLine = the average of all rackets
Where the specs differ
Show all specs (3 the same)
Reviews and videos
No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Counter Viper 2.6: 1. Of the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera: 0.
Often mentioned in video reviews
- Good control 8×
- Lots of power 6×
- Large sweet spot 6×
- Versatile 4×
- Easy to handle 2×
- Good at the net 2×
- Demanding, needs good technique 5×
- Lacks power 4×
- Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
- Harder to handle 3×
- Head-heavy 2×
- Little feel 2×
- Expensive 2×
- Small sweet spot 2×
No summarised videos yet.
Or a third racket in between
Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Counter Viper 2.6, more handling than the Maxx Flow Gen 2 Bea Caldera.
Was this page useful?











