Rackets › Compare

Bullpadel Xplo 02 27 vs Stiga 1.3K Hard Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Xplo 02 27 if you want more control, comfort and handling, the 1.3K Hard Cybershape if you want more power.

Xplo 02 27Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Control+2.0
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.0
1.3K Hard Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Power+2.0

Better buy now: the 1.3K Hard Cybershape. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 150.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Xplo 02 27 to the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: less control, more power, less comfort, less handling.

Controlless control6.54.5
Powermore power6.08.0
Comfortless comfort6.04.0
Handlingless handling4.53.5
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness5.04.5

Xplo 02 271.3K Hard CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2027
Not published
Weight
365 to 375 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Face
X Tend Carbon 3K
1.3K Carbon Fusion
Core
MultiEVA
Performance Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
507 cm²
Not published
Surface
3D
Sandy
Handle
Hesacore
Detachable wrist strap
Frame
Carbon
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Xplo 02 27: 0. Of the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: 0.

Xplo 02 27: reviews and videos →1.3K Hard Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

BabolatAir Veron 2.6

Better where both are weak: handling 5.5 against 4.5 and 3.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 154.80Compare all three →

Was this page useful?