Rackets › Compare

Siux Fenix Go 4 vs Stiga 1.3K Hard Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the 1.3K Hard Cybershape if you want more handling. The Fenix Go 4 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Fenix Go 4Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

1.3K Hard Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0

Better buy now: the Fenix Go 4. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 100.05 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Fenix Go 4 to the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: more handling.

Controlabout the same4.54.5
Powera bit less power8.58.0
Comforta bit more comfort3.54.0
Handlingmore handling2.53.5
Forgivenessabout the same4.54.5

Fenix Go 41.3K Hard CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
Not published
Weight
355 to 375 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Face
3K carbon
1.3K Carbon Fusion
Core
EVA Hard rubber
Performance Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Flat
Sandy
Handle
Not published
Detachable wrist strap
Frame
3K carbon and fiberglass
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Fenix Go 4: 0. Of the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: 0.

Fenix Go 4: reviews and videos →1.3K Hard Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

JomaSlam Pro Iconic

Sits between the two on paper: more handling than the Fenix Go 4, more control than the 1.3K Hard Cybershape.

€ 109.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?