Rackets › Compare

Stiga 1.3K Hard Cybershape vs Babolat Counter Veron 2025 2.5

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the 1.3K Hard Cybershape if you want more handling, the Counter Veron 2025 2.5 if you want more comfort.

1.3K Hard Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0
Counter Veron 2025 2.5Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5

Better buy now: the Counter Veron 2025 2.5. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 0.95 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 1.3K Hard Cybershape to the Counter Veron 2025 2.5: more comfort, less handling.

Controla bit more control4.55.0
Powera bit less power8.07.5
Comfortmore comfort4.05.5
Handlingless handling3.52.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness4.55.0

1.3K Hard CybershapeCounter Veron 2025 2.5Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
Not published
2025
Shape
Cybershape
Hybrid
Weight
360 g
365 g
Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
1.3K Carbon Fusion
Carbon Flex
Core
Performance Foam
X-eva
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Sandy
Rough
Handle
Detachable wrist strap
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
carbon frame

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: 0. Of the Counter Veron 2025 2.5: 0.

1.3K Hard Cybershape: reviews and videos →Counter Veron 2025 2.5: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

NoxVentus Control 3K

Better where both are weak: handling 4.5 against 3.5 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 344.16Compare all three →