
Babolat Technical Viper Soft 3.0
Played by Alejandra Alonso
7.0padell.io scoreSpecs + 2 review sources- Shape
- Diamond
- Weight
- 365 g
- Balance
- Head-heavy
- Core
- Black EVA
A power racket: strong on smashes and volleys. Slower to swing and to react with.
Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.Strong at
- Strong on smashes and volleys
- High ball exit for defense and transitions
- Accessible power from medium acceleration swings
Less strong at
- Slower to swing
- Harder to place precisely
- Punishes off-centre hits
How it plays
Line = the average of all rackets ▲ above ▼ below
A power racket: strong on smashes and volleys. Slower to swing and to react with.
Specifications
Not published by the brand: head size, handle
Specs from the brand's own site · checked 23 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Tell us →
We started tracking this racket on 23 Sept. The chart appears after a week of prices.
What reviewers say
Best forAdvanced aggressive players seeking diamond racket pressure
Review in SpanishRead the full review →“Choose this model for aggressive left-side play, repeated viboras, purposeful volleys and smashes where you want strong output without the driest possible impact.”
Read the full review →Similar rackets
Questions before you buy
Is the Technical Viper Soft 3.0 worth the money right now?
Today's price is labelled "Good value" compared with the rackets that play most alike. Which shops deliver, and what shipping costs, depends on your country. The price comparison shows it for yours.
See all pricesWhat is the closest alternative?
The Siux Fenix Lite 4 plays most alike. On paper the differences are under one point.
Compare side by side →Who should not buy it?
Skip it if you rely on placement and long rallies (control 2.5/10), or if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 4.0/10), or if you are still learning: it is not very forgiving (2.5/10).
How heavy is it really?
The brand gives 365 g. That counts as medium on our scale. Each racket can differ within that range.
Why a range? →


